Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen3.8 27B
API pricing, context, and independently measured performance, side by side. Qwen3.8 27B starts 66% cheaper on input than Gemma 4 31B at list prices.
Gemma 4 31B
Google · released Apr 2, 2026
Best input$0.10 / MTok
Best output$0.214 / MTok
Context262K
Providers20
Fastest measured0.35s° TTFT · 45 tok/s
Open weightsVisionToolsReasoningStructured outputPrompt caching
Qwen3.8 27B
Qwen · released Aug 14, 2026
Best input$0.034 / MTok
Best output$0.32 / MTok
Context1.02M
Providers24
Fastest measured0.51s° TTFT · 188 tok/s
Open weightsVisionToolsReasoningStructured outputPrompt caching
Cheapest providers, measuredUSD / MTOK
| MODEL | PROVIDER | INPUT | OUTPUT | TTFT | TPS | SMOKE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemma 4 31B |  CoreWeave | $0.10 | $0.34 | 1.6s° | 5° tok/s | 5/5 |
| Gemma 4 31B |  Venice | $0.12 | $0.36 | 1.4s° | 45° tok/s | 5/5 |
| Gemma 4 31B |  Chutes | $0.12 | $0.37 | 4.2s° | 29° tok/s | 5/5 |
| Qwen3.8 27B |  PrimeIntellect | $0.034 | $1.86 | — | — | — |
| Qwen3.8 27B |  Darkbloom | $0.035 | $1.50 | 5.1s° | 93° tok/s | — |
| Qwen3.8 27B | Chutes | $0.039 | $1.25 | 3.2s° | 54° tok/s | 4/5 |
TTFT/TPS: ModelIndex-measured medians (P50, trailing 21d) · chat10k profile (~10K in / 200 out) · ° = measured via OpenRouter routing (adds a hop) · SMOKE: of 5 programmatic capability probes passed · methodology v1.1 — full details on each model page