Models/Qwen3.8 27B vs GLM 5.1

Qwen3.8 27B vs GLM 5.1

API pricing, context, and independently measured performance, side by side. Qwen3.8 27B starts 90% cheaper on input than GLM 5.1 at list prices.

Qwen3.8 27B
Qwen · released Aug 14, 2026
Best input$0.10 / MTok
Best output$1.80 / MTok
Context1M
Providers17
Fastest measured0.91s° TTFT · 33 tok/s
Open weightsVisionToolsReasoningStructured outputPrompt caching
GLM 5.1
Z.ai · released Apr 7, 2026
Best input$0.965 / MTok
Best output$3.03 / MTok
Context205K
Providers16
Fastest measured0.85s° TTFT · 22 tok/s
Open weightsToolsReasoningStructured outputPrompt caching
Cheapest providers, measuredUSD / MTOK
MODELPROVIDERINPUTOUTPUTTTFTTPSSMOKE
Qwen3.8 27BDarkbloom logoDarkbloom$0.10$1.80
Qwen3.8 27BDEDekaLLM$0.10$2.50
Qwen3.8 27BReka logoReka$0.104$2.171s°48° tok/s4/5
GLM 5.1Baidu logoBaidu$0.965$3.031s°58° tok/s3/5
GLM 5.1StreamLake logoStreamLake$0.966$3.042.5s°46° tok/s2/5
GLM 5.1Chutes logoChutes$0.98$3.082.9s°38° tok/s3/5
TTFT/TPS: ModelIndex-measured medians (P50, trailing 21d) · chat10k profile (~10K in / 200 out) · ° = measured via OpenRouter routing (adds a hop) · SMOKE: of 5 programmatic capability probes passed · methodology v1.1 — full details on each model page
All 17 providers for Qwen3.8 27BAll 16 providers for GLM 5.1Open in comparator