Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Gemma 4 31B
API pricing, context, and independently measured performance, side by side. Gemma 4 26B A4B starts 53% cheaper on input than Gemma 4 31B at list prices.
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Google · released Apr 3, 2026
Best input$0.042 / MTok
Best output$0.22 / MTok
Context262K
Providers13
Fastest measured0.28s° TTFT · 87 tok/s
Open weightsVisionToolsReasoningStructured outputPrompt caching
Gemma 4 31B
Google · released Apr 2, 2026
Best input$0.09 / MTok
Best output$0.34 / MTok
Context262K
Providers15
Fastest measured1.4s° TTFT · 20 tok/s
Open weightsVisionToolsReasoningStructured outputPrompt caching
Cheapest providers, measuredUSD / MTOK
| MODEL | PROVIDER | INPUT | OUTPUT | TTFT | TPS | SMOKE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemma 4 26B A4B | $0.042 | $0.22 | — | — | 5/5 | |
| Gemma 4 26B A4B | $0.052 | $0.225 | — | — | — | |
| Gemma 4 26B A4B | DEDekaLLM | $0.06 | $0.33 | 1.7s° | 78° tok/s | — |
| Gemma 4 31B | $0.09 | $0.34 | — | — | 5/5 | |
| Gemma 4 31B | $0.10 | $0.34 | 3s° | 46° tok/s | 5/5 | |
| Gemma 4 31B | $0.12 | $0.36 | — | — | 5/5 |
TTFT/TPS: ModelIndex-measured medians (P50, trailing 21d) · chat10k profile (~10K in / 200 out) · ° = measured via OpenRouter routing (adds a hop) · SMOKE: of 5 programmatic capability probes passed · methodology v1.1 — full details on each model page