Models/DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Kimi K2.6

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Kimi K2.6

API pricing, context, and independently measured performance, side by side. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 starts 82% cheaper on input than Kimi K2.6 at list prices.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
DeepSeek · released Oct 17, 2026
Best input$0.08 / MTok
Best output$0.18 / MTok
Context1.05M
Providers19
Fastest measured0.69s° TTFT · 131 tok/s
Open weightsVisionToolsReasoningStructured outputPrompt caching
Kimi K2.6
Moonshot AI · released Apr 20, 2026
Best input$0.441 / MTok
Best output$1.95 / MTok
Context262K
Providers17
Fastest measured0.56s° TTFT · 126 tok/s
Open weightsVisionToolsReasoningStructured outputPrompt caching
Cheapest providers, measuredUSD / MTOK
MODELPROVIDERINPUTOUTPUTTTFTTPSSMOKE
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Relace logoRelace$0.05$0.0240.69s°131° tok/s—
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017InferenceNet logoInferenceNet$0.08$0.50———
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Morph logoMorph$0.08$0.60———
Kimi K2.6Inceptron logoInceptron$0.441$3.200.83s°89° tok/s3/5
Kimi K2.6Chutes logoChutes$0.45$1.9525.1s°8° tok/s3/5
Kimi K2.6DigitalOcean logoDigitalOcean$0.57$2.40———
TTFT/TPS: ModelIndex-measured medians (P50, trailing 21d) · chat10k profile (~10K in / 200 out) · ° = measured via OpenRouter routing (adds a hop) · SMOKE: of 5 programmatic capability probes passed · methodology v1.1 — full details on each model page
All 19 providers for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017All 17 providers for Kimi K2.6Open in comparator