Models/DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GLM 5.2

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GLM 5.2

API pricing, context, and independently measured performance, side by side. GLM 5.2 starts 51% cheaper on input than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 at list prices.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
DeepSeek · released Oct 17, 2026
Best input$0.07 / MTok
Best output$0.15 / MTok
Context1.05M
Providers33
Fastest measured0.69s° TTFT · 131 tok/s
Open weightsVisionToolsReasoningStructured outputPrompt caching
GLM 5.2
Z.ai · released Jun 16, 2026
Best input$0.034 / MTok
Best output$1.80 / MTok
Context1.05M
Providers37
Fastest measured0.63s° TTFT · 90 tok/s
Open weightsToolsReasoningStructured outputPrompt caching
Cheapest providers, measuredUSD / MTOK
MODELPROVIDERINPUTOUTPUTTTFTTPSSMOKE
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017OPOpenInference$0.07$0.50———
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Relace logoRelace$0.07$0.500.69s°131° tok/s—
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017InferenceNet logoInferenceNet$0.08$0.50———
GLM 5.2Wafer logoWafer$0.034$7.000.63s°90° tok/s—
GLM 5.2Cloudflare logoCloudflare$0.19$8.000.85s°162° tok/s—
GLM 5.2Morph logoMorph$0.28$4.40———
TTFT/TPS: ModelIndex-measured medians (P50, trailing 21d) · chat10k profile (~10K in / 200 out) · ° = measured via OpenRouter routing (adds a hop) · SMOKE: of 5 programmatic capability probes passed · methodology v1.1 — full details on each model page
All 33 providers for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017All 37 providers for GLM 5.2Open in comparator