Models/DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GLM 5.3

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GLM 5.3

API pricing, context, and independently measured performance, side by side. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 starts 77% cheaper on input than GLM 5.3 at list prices.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
DeepSeek · released Oct 17, 2026
Best input$0.016 / MTok
Best output$0.12 / MTok
Context1.05M
Providers44
Fastest measured0.21s° TTFT · 476 tok/s
Open weightsVisionToolsReasoningStructured outputPrompt caching
GLM 5.3
Z.ai · released Aug 18, 2026
Best input$0.07 / MTok
Best output$0.88 / MTok
Context1.05M
Providers51
Fastest measured0.49s° TTFT · 115 tok/s
Open weightsToolsReasoningStructured outputPrompt caching
Cheapest providers, measuredUSD / MTOK
MODELPROVIDERINPUTOUTPUTTTFTTPSSMOKE
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017OPOpenInference$0.016$1.441.2s°20° tok/s—
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Engy logoEngy$0.03$0.12———
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Wafer logoWafer$0.038$0.500.31s°434° tok/s—
GLM 5.3Wafer logoWafer$0.07$1.404.7s°117° tok/s—
GLM 5.3Relace logoRelace$0.07$4.381s°198° tok/s—
GLM 5.3InferenceNet logoInferenceNet$0.08$3.601s°208° tok/s—
TTFT/TPS: ModelIndex-measured medians (P50, trailing 21d) · chat10k profile (~10K in / 200 out) · ° = measured via OpenRouter routing (adds a hop) · SMOKE: of 5 programmatic capability probes passed · methodology v1.1 — full details on each model page
All 44 providers for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017All 51 providers for GLM 5.3Open in comparator