Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
API pricing, context, and independently measured performance, side by side. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview starts 50% cheaper on input than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B at list prices.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Google · released Feb 19, 2026
Best input$1.00 / MTok
Best output$6.00 / MTok
Context1.05M
Providers6
Fastest measured2.6s° TTFT · 285 tok/s
VisionToolsReasoningStructured outputPrompt caching
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Qwen · released Aug 12, 2026
Best input$2.00 / MTok
Best output$6.00 / MTok
Context1.05M
Providers6
Fastest measured1s° TTFT · 122 tok/s
Open weightsToolsReasoningStructured outputPrompt caching
Cheapest providers, measuredUSD / MTOK
| MODEL | PROVIDER | INPUT | OUTPUT | TTFT | TPS | SMOKE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |  Google AI Studio | $1.00 | $6.00 | 3.3s° | 671° tok/s | — |
| Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |  Google | $1.00 | $6.00 | 2.6s° | 285° tok/s | — |
| Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B |  DeepInfra | $2.00 | $6.00 | 1.3s° | 76° tok/s | 4/5 |
| Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B |  SiliconFlow | $2.00 | $6.00 | 2.7s° | 49° tok/s | 5/5 |
| Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | MOModal | $2.00 | $6.00 | 1s° | 122° tok/s | 4/5 |
TTFT/TPS: ModelIndex-measured medians (P50, trailing 72h) · chat10k profile (~10K in / 200 out) · ° = measured via OpenRouter routing (adds a hop) · SMOKE: of 5 programmatic capability probes passed · methodology v1.1 — full details on each model page