Llama 4 Maverick vs Llama 4 Scout
API pricing, context, and independently measured performance, side by side. Llama 4 Scout starts 47% cheaper on input than Llama 4 Maverick at list prices.
Llama 4 Maverick
Meta · released Apr 5, 2025
Best input$0.188 / MTok
Best output$0.652 / MTok
Context1.05M
Providers4
Fastest measured0.65s° TTFT · 52 tok/s
Open weightsVisionToolsStructured outputPrompt caching
Llama 4 Scout
Meta · released Apr 5, 2025
Best input$0.10 / MTok
Best output$0.30 / MTok
Context1.31M
Providers3
Fastest measured0.43s° TTFT · 62 tok/s
Open weightsVisionToolsStructured output
Cheapest providers, measuredUSD / MTOK
| MODEL | PROVIDER | INPUT | OUTPUT | TTFT | TPS | SMOKE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Llama 4 Maverick |  DigitalOcean | $0.188 | $0.652 | 0.72s° | 38° tok/s | 5/5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick |  Novita | $0.27 | $0.85 | 0.76s° | 41° tok/s | 4/5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick |  Parasail | $0.35 | $1.00 | 0.65s° | 52° tok/s | 5/5 |
| Llama 4 Scout |  DeepInfra | $0.10 | $0.30 | 0.43s° | 62° tok/s | — |
| Llama 4 Scout | Novita | $0.18 | $0.59 | — | — | — |
| Llama 4 Scout |  Google | $0.25 | $0.70 | — | — | — |
TTFT/TPS: ModelIndex-measured medians (P50, trailing 21d) · chat10k profile (~10K in / 200 out) · ° = measured via OpenRouter routing (adds a hop) · SMOKE: of 5 programmatic capability probes passed · methodology v1.1 — full details on each model page