Kimi K2.6 vs Qwen3.8 27B
API pricing, context, and independently measured performance, side by side. Qwen3.8 27B starts 79% cheaper on input than Kimi K2.6 at list prices.
Kimi K2.6
Moonshot AI · released Apr 20, 2026
Best input$0.471 / MTok
Best output$2.40 / MTok
Context262K
Providers22
Fastest measured0.37s° TTFT · 333 tok/s
Open weightsVisionToolsReasoningStructured outputPrompt caching
Qwen3.8 27B
Qwen · released Aug 14, 2026
Best input$0.10 / MTok
Best output$1.80 / MTok
Context1M
Providers17
Fastest measured0.91s° TTFT · 33 tok/s
Open weightsVisionToolsReasoningStructured outputPrompt caching
Cheapest providers, measuredUSD / MTOK
| MODEL | PROVIDER | INPUT | OUTPUT | TTFT | TPS | SMOKE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimi K2.6 | INInceptron | $0.471 | $2.83 | 0.86s° | 80° tok/s | 3/5 |
| Kimi K2.6 | CHChutes | $0.50 | $2.85 | 2.9s° | 33° tok/s | 3/5 |
| Kimi K2.6 | DIDigitalOcean | $0.57 | $2.40 | 1.4s° | 68° tok/s | — |
| Qwen3.8 27B | DADarkbloom | $0.10 | $1.80 | — | — | — |
| Qwen3.8 27B |  DeepInfra | $0.15 | $1.88 | — | — | — |
| Qwen3.8 27B | PHPhala | $0.199 | $2.08 | 0.91s° | 33° tok/s | — |
TTFT/TPS: ModelIndex-measured medians (P50, trailing 21d) · chat10k profile (~10K in / 200 out) · ° = measured via OpenRouter routing (adds a hop) · SMOKE: of 5 programmatic capability probes passed · methodology v1.1 — full details on each model page