Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs GLM 5.3
API pricing, context, and independently measured performance, side by side. GLM 5.3 starts 30% cheaper on input than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B at list prices.
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Qwen · released Aug 12, 2026
Best input$2.00 / MTok
Best output$6.00 / MTok
Context1.05M
Providers6
Fastest measured1s° TTFT · 122 tok/s
Open weightsToolsReasoningStructured outputPrompt caching
GLM 5.3
Z.ai · released Aug 18, 2026
Best input$1.40 / MTok
Best output$4.40 / MTok
Context1.05M
Providers1
Fastest measured0.86s° TTFT · 52 tok/s
ToolsReasoningStructured outputPrompt caching
Cheapest providers, measuredUSD / MTOK
| MODEL | PROVIDER | INPUT | OUTPUT | TTFT | TPS | SMOKE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B |  DeepInfra | $2.00 | $6.00 | 1.3s° | 76° tok/s | 4/5 |
| Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B |  SiliconFlow | $2.00 | $6.00 | 2.7s° | 49° tok/s | 5/5 |
| Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | MOModal | $2.00 | $6.00 | 1s° | 122° tok/s | 4/5 |
| GLM 5.3 |  Z.AI | $1.40 | $4.40 | 0.86s° | 52° tok/s | — |
TTFT/TPS: ModelIndex-measured medians (P50, trailing 72h) · chat10k profile (~10K in / 200 out) · ° = measured via OpenRouter routing (adds a hop) · SMOKE: of 5 programmatic capability probes passed · methodology v1.1 — full details on each model page