Models/DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM 5.3 Flash

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM 5.3 Flash

API pricing, context, and independently measured performance, side by side. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash starts 25% cheaper on input than GLM 5.3 Flash at list prices.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
DeepSeek · released Sep 10, 2026
Best input$0.03 / MTok
Best output$0.12 / MTok
Context1.05M
Providers39
Fastest measured0.23s° TTFT · 382 tok/s
Open weightsVisionToolsReasoningStructured outputPrompt caching
GLM 5.3 Flash
Z.ai · released Aug 26, 2026
Best input$0.04 / MTok
Best output$0.078 / MTok
Context1.05M
Providers45
Fastest measured0.46s° TTFT · 99 tok/s
Open weightsVisionToolsReasoningStructured outputPrompt caching
Cheapest providers, measuredUSD / MTOK
MODELPROVIDERINPUTOUTPUTTTFTTPSSMOKE
DeepSeek V4.1 FlashEngy logoEngy$0.03$0.12———
DeepSeek V4.1 FlashMorph logoMorph$0.04$0.603.3s°74° tok/s—
DeepSeek V4.1 FlashWafer logoWafer$0.051$0.5670.33s°441° tok/s—
GLM 5.3 FlashRelace logoRelace$0.04$0.0781.1s°141° tok/s—
GLM 5.3 FlashWafer logoWafer$0.042$0.1840.51s°247° tok/s—
GLM 5.3 FlashOPOpenInference$0.06$0.306.7s°80° tok/s—
TTFT/TPS: ModelIndex-measured medians (P50, trailing 21d) · chat10k profile (~10K in / 200 out) · ° = measured via OpenRouter routing (adds a hop) · SMOKE: of 5 programmatic capability probes passed · methodology v1.1 — full details on each model page
All 39 providers for DeepSeek V4.1 FlashAll 45 providers for GLM 5.3 FlashOpen in comparator